Cases 41 - 50 of 472
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Holman v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 23-5493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOLMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency
Alison Kareem v. Cuyahoga County, OH Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALISON KAREEM
Defendant / Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH BOARD OF ELECTIONS, FRANK LAROSE, Ohio Secretary of State and MICHAEL C. O'MALLEY, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney
Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. US Department Of Education et al
as 1:2023cv10795
Plaintiff:
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Miguel Cardona, Richard Cordray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leathers et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Anne M Leathers, Michael Roe, Jr., Lonnie Pittman and others
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R Biden, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SeMa'j Griffin v. Secretary of Defense
as 23-3220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEMA'J GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Jacobs v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv10530
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Jacobs
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
