Cases 51 - 60 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bennington v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv00688
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Bennington
Defendant:
Ohio Attorney General and Adams County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beyoglides v. Montgomery County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Harry G Beyoglides, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff, NaphCare, Inc., Ted Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks, et al. v. Ripley, Union, Lewis, Huntington School District, et al.
as 1:2014cv00412
Defendant:
Susie Jane Skinner, Ripley, Union, Lewis, Huntington School District, Ripley, Union, Lewis, Huntington Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Brooks , Vincent Brooks and Randy Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckham et al v. City of Euclid et al
as 1:2014cv00696
Defendant:
City of Euclid, Ohio, Daniel A Dunlap , Cynthia Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Cachet Beckham and Marcus A. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. The City of Youngstown, Ohio et al
as 4:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Alexander Henderson
Defendant:
The City of Youngstown, Ohio and Rodney Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 4:2014cv00334
Plaintiff:
Alexander Henderson
Defendant:
The City of Youngstown, Ohio and Rodney W. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
