Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Hamad v. Cedar Fair L.P. et al
as 3:2015cv01657
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Hamad
Defendant:
Cedar Fair L.P., Magnum Management Corp., Cedar Point Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv02460
Plaintiff:
Joshua Barrett
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Martinez, Ginn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ndoye v. Major Performance LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ndeye Ndoye
Defendant:
Major Performance LLC , Julie Majors , Westlake Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Dresher v. Lucas County et al
as 3:2015cv00585
Defendant:
Lucas County , Lucas County Sheriff Deputy John Doe #1 , Lucas County Sheriff Deputy John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dresher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lovelace v. City of Ripley, Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02152
Plaintiff:
Cleve Wesley Lovelace
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Tennessee, Lauderdale County, Tennessee, City of Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Latham v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2014cv02326
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Latham, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Columbus, James Kirk, Shannon Schmid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe 1, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICK SNYDER, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Fox v. Moore et al
as 3:2014cv01100
Plaintiff:
Camille Fox
Defendant:
Michael E. Moore , City of Toledo , Lucas County Board Of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
