Cases 71 - 80 of 188
Roth v. City of Canton et al
as 5:2017cv00234
Defendant:
City of Canton, Ohio, City of Canton Police Department, Shirley Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Colbetzor v. Beverlin et al
as 5:2016cv03058
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Colbetzor
Defendant:
John Beverlin , Akron Board of Education , Thomas Kekela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights Ohio v. Multi-County Juvenile Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Ohio
Defendant:
Multi-County Juvenile Detention Center and Dana C Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeis v. Springfield Township, Ohio et al
as 5:2016cv02331
Plaintiff:
Haydn Zeis
Defendant:
Springfield Township, Ohio , Robert Scherer , John A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midell et al v. Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services et al
as 1:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Robert Midell
Defendant:
Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services, Hamilton County, Greg Hartmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Scott et al
as 1:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Ruby Hicks
Defendant:
Doris A Scott , Justin T Moore , Benjamin M. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Conneaut et al
as 1:2016cv01162
Defendant:
City of Conneaut , Charles Burlingham , Denny R. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
