Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Absolute Management I, LLC v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2012cv14014
Plaintiff:
Absolute Management I, LLC
Defendant:
Oakland, County of, Michael J. Bouchard, Paul Kinal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
El Ssayed v. Western Michigan University et al
as 1:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Hatem El Ssayed
Defendant:
Western Michigan University , Muhamed Sultan , Carla Koretsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauss v. A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12533
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bauss
Defendant:
A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc., Matthew Maddock, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Zdebski v. Schmucker et al
as 2:2012cv12392
Plaintiff:
Jason Zdebski
Defendant:
Chad C. Schmucker, KRISTE ETUE, Prosecuting Attorney's Coordinating Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McPhail v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2012cv12134
Plaintiff:
Julie McPhail
Defendant:
Macomb, County of , Macomb County Sheriff's Department , Anthony Wickersham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zdebski v. Cooper et al
as 2:2012cv12008
Plaintiff:
Jason Zdebski
Defendant:
Jessica R. Cooper, Oakland Country Prosecutor's Office, Bill Bullard, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2012cv10335
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Kevin Session, George Day and others
Plaintiff:
Derrell Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Dissette et al
as 1:2011cv01260
Plaintiff:
Maureen Jordan
Defendant:
Brian Dissette , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2011cv14274
Defendant:
Wayne, County of , John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Julan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv13518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
