Civil Rights Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 434
Martin v. Putman et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff: Erwin D. Martin
Defendant: Eric Putman, f/n/u Allen, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Marriage Ministries v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: American Marriage Ministries
Defendant: Cheryl Collins, Jennings Jones, Coty Wamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02355
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff: Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant: Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff: Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant: Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?