Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Walker v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2015cv02340
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Walker
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, County of Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Hayes, Sr. v. A.C. Wharton, et al
as 14-5948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. HAYES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
A.C. WHARTON, Mayor of the City of Memphis, CITY OF MEMPHIS, DENEEN ALSADI, H.R. Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Wade et al
as 2:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
Randy Wade, Steve Cohen, A.C. Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water, et al
as 13-5163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA REED-RAJAPAKSE
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS AND WATER, PRESIDENT JERRY COLLINS, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2012cv02896
Plaintiff:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Tony Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis, et al
as 2:2012cv02897
Plaintiff:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Tony Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water et al
as 2:2012cv02807
Plaintiff:
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas and Water, Jerry Collins, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2012cv02795
Plaintiff:
I-Ariel Daniel: ibn Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Toney Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
