Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Ferrell v. Overton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Brandy Danielle Ferrell
Defendant:
Overton County, Tennessee, Clyde Collier and Matthew Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Postles v. Courtner
as 1:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Johnny Justin Postles
Defendant:
Matthew Robert Courtner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargo v. Graves et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Derrick Vargo
Defendant:
Matthew Graves and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Brown
Defendant:
Matthew Scott and Jason Mosier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Pigeon Forge Police Department
as 3:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Pigeon Forge Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pobieglo v. Pobieglo
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Marie Pobieglo
Defendant:
Matthew Allen Pobieglo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Blount Pride, Inc et al v. Desmond et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Blount Pride, Inc and Matthew Lovegood
Defendant:
Ryan K Desmond, James Berrong, Tony Crisp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blount Pride, Inc et al v. Desmond et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Blount Pride, Inc and Matthew Lovegood
Defendant:
Ryan K Desmond, James Berrong, Tony Crisp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamar v. Boles et al
as 3:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Mary Lamar
Defendant:
Russell Boles, Matthew Norman and Darren Rider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Neisen v. Rohmfeld et al
as 3:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Matthew Rohmfeld, Allison Renfro Rattan, Rutherford County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
