Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00863
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Battle Creek, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00853
Defendant:
Roger Ballard, Ted Dearing, Jill Humphreys-Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Autumn Rosanne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Morris v. Ascension Macomb Oakland Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv11502
Plaintiff:
Alexander Morris
Defendant:
Greg Ciesielski, Ascension Macomb Oakland Hospital and Holly Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Management Solutions Holdings, LLC et al v. City of Southfield
as 2:2024cv10279
Plaintiff:
Management Solutions Holdings, LLC, Shannon Steel and Aaron Morris
Defendant:
Southfield, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv13185
Plaintiff:
Montaz Kennedy
Defendant:
India Smith, John Doe, Johnny Thomas and others
Abney v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv11790
Plaintiff:
Devon Terrell Abney
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and Curtis D. Morris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fox et al v. City of Jackson, Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv11298
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fox, Michael Wisniewski and Oswego View, LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Michigan, Daniel Mahoney, Arlene Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
