Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Oka Nashoba Chikashah Nation v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv02448
Plaintiff:
Oka Nashoba Chikashah Nation and Chief Nowanaki Yanash, Kyle Watkins also known as Chief Eagle Eye, Katrian Green-Watkins and Coosa Nation of North America (USA), a sister Nation and Juridical Personality
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, Regina Morrison Newman, Gregory S. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gruber et al v. Tennessee Tech Board of Trustees et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dr. Julia Gruber and Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Tennessee Tech Board of Trustees doing business as Tennessee Tech University, Dr. Lori Bruce, Dr. Claire Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02092
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Rowan v. US Trustee et al
as 2:2012cv02541
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
US Trustee and Bettye Sue Bedwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H B vs. Harper, et al
as 1:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
H B
Defendant:
Sandra Harper , Steve Nunley , Tim Haney and others
Miscellaneou:
Shonna Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
