Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jami Steeg v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 17-5737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMI W. STEEG
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Louisville Kentucky and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
John Medved v. U.S. Attorney, et al
as 17-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. MEDVED
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY, N.D. Ohio and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Robert Irvin v. William Haynes, Jr., et al
as 17-5612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., Senior United States District Judge, THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Medved v. U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Loper v. FBI-Cleveland Field Office et al
as 1:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Latasha Loper
Defendant:
FBI-Cleveland Field Office, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Columbus Ohio Police, Freddie Rufus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
