Cases 11 - 20 of 360
Jimmie Gordon v. Sherry Burt, et al
as 23-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMIE LEON GORDON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY L. BURT, sued in her individual capacity as an employee of the State of Michigan, DARRELL M. STEWARD, sued in his individual capacity as an employee of the State of Michigan and ELISIA HARDIMAN, sued in her individual capacity as an employee of the State of Michigan
Holbrook #767925 v. State of Michigan
as 1:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Charles Judson Holbrook #767925
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv12134
Petitioner:
Nicholas Elliott Scott
Respondent:
Fredeane Artis and People of the State of Michigan
McCreay v. State of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11774
Petitioner:
Carnell M. McCreary
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Fells v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11653
Petitioner:
Stanlee Fells
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Reaves v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv11633
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Respondent:
Warden Catherine S. Bauman
Petitioner:
Turon Jerome Reaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Murray v. Douglas
as 2:2023cv11636
Petitioner:
Kirk Murray
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan and Adam Douglas
Crenshaw v. Michigan, State of
as 2:2023cv11507
Plaintiff:
DeMario Reed Crenshaw
Defendant:
State of Michigan and Michigan, State of
Loomis v. Bay County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv11511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Loomis
Defendant:
Bay County Sheriff's Department and Department of Corrections, State of Michigan
Curtis v. Christianson
as 4:2023cv11391
Petitioner:
Ra'Sean Curtis
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Michigan and John Christiansen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
