Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Moore v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv11957
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Rickman #252749 v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Milton D. Rickman #252749
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Unknown Rink, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #412981 v. Parrish et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tremain Vernon Jones #412981
Defendant:
Lynn Parrish , D. Maynard , Jay Kimbill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matzke #377681 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
William Matzke #377681
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, Jeffrey Woods, Michael Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Parrish et al
as 4:2014cv13153
Plaintiff:
Tremain Jones
Defendant:
Lynn Parrish, D. Maynard, Jay Kimbill and others
McKenzie #151647 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00291
Plaintiff:
Teddy McKenzie #151647, David W. Smith #246504, Matthew Peter Onon #409263 and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Heyns, Dennis Straub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #343032 v. Martin et al
as 2:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Apollo Johnson #343032
Defendant:
Michael Martin and James Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairfield #435479 v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Fairfield #435479, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Alexander, Unknown Pokely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin #482984 v. Woods
as 2:2012cv00294
Petitioner:
Harry Lonzo Bolton Ervin #482984
Respondent:
Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gresham #272603 v. Dahl et al
as 2:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Nicole Dahl, Robert Napel, Unknown Sanderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
