Cases 21 - 30 of 270
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxie v. Laird et al
as 5:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Maxie
Defendant:
Brian Laird, B. Jones, J. Euteneier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Christian County Jail
as 5:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Byran Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Christian County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jackson et al
as 6:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Adam Jackson
Defendant:
Malachi Jackson and Grant Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Mosley et al
as 6:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jerry Robinson
Defendant:
Jammie Mosley, Laurel County, APRN Chastity King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cameron et al
as 4:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Freida Darlene Johnson
Defendant:
Attorney General Daniel Cameron, Commonwealth of KY and Lisa Payne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cameron et al
as 4:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Freida Johnson
Defendant:
Danieal Cameron, Lisa Payne Jones, Leigh Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hopkins County Detention Center
as 4:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Caleb V. Jones
Defendant:
Hopkins County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hurley et al
as 6:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Jones
Defendant:
Hurley and J. Hutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
