Cases 21 - 30 of 78
JD Robinson v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JD KIMCORNEIL ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, JOAN YUKINS, Assistant Deputy Director, KENNETH T. MCKEE, Correctional Facilities Administration Deputy Director and others
Joei Jordan v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEI ALEXANDER JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, JOAN YUKINS, Assistant Deputy Director, KENNETH T. MCKEE, Correctional Facilities Administration Deputy Director and others
Johnnie Burkett v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE BURKETT
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, JOAN YUKINS, Correctional Facilities Administration Deputy Director Michigan Department of Corrections, MIKE BROWN, Warden, Kinross Correctional Facility and others
Jonathan Good v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JOSEPH GOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, JOAN YUKINS, Correctional Facilities Administration Deputy Director, KENNETH T. MCKEE, Correctional Facilities Administration Deputy Director and others
Quandraiko Hayes v. Mike Brown
as 22-1527
Petitioner / Appellant:
QUANDRAIKO HAYES
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE BROWN, Warden
Fox #412119 v. Brown
as 1:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jon Thomas Fox
Defendant:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jon Thomas Fox #412119
Respondent:
Mike Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Montaldi v. Mike Brown
as 22-1340
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID TYLER MONTALDI
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE BROWN, Warden
Samuel Wood v. Mike Brown
as 22-1094
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL LAWRENCE WOOD
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE BROWN, Warden
Freese v. Brown
as 2:2021cv12800
Petitioner:
James Freese, II
Respondent:
Warden Mike Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
