Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Wilson v. ABL Food Services et al
as 3:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Archie Tyrone Wilson
Defendant:
ABL Food Services, Verniszine Dulin and Metropolitan Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billioups v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County et al
as 3:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
Kevin Derell Billioups
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County , ABL , Timothy Hindsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County et al
as 3:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
Devonta Cunningham
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County , ABL and Thomas Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ables v. USA
as 2:2011cv00124
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey A. Ables
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kelley v. C.C.S et al
as 3:2010cv00632
Plaintiff:
Carl Eugene Kelley
Defendant:
C.C.S, D.C.S.O and ABL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Hall et al
as 3:2010cv00598
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Riley
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Wade Hales, John Troup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Bodie et al
as 3:2010cv00561
Defendant:
Austin Bodie and ABL Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ledale Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Tenn. Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
James W. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Tenn. Dept of Corrections, Gayle Ray, Ruben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2009cv01154
Plaintiff:
Gary Lamont Holt, Jr.
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office and ABL Food Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillippe Rogers v. Davidson County Sherif's Offic, et al
as 09-6376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIPPE ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIF'S OFFICE, (DCSO), ABL FOODSERVICE, CORRECT CARE SOLLUTIONS, (CCS) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
