Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Card v. Shelby County Correction Center et al
as 2:2013cv02359
Plaintiff:
Bruce Ellsworth Card
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center, Caruthers and Herron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Correctional Corp. America et al
as 1:2013cv01009
Plaintiff:
Devon J. Parker
Defendant:
Joe Easterling , Deanne Mills , Dorothy Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Long et al
as 3:2012cv01000
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Dalton
Defendant:
f/n/u Herron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Correctional Corp. America et al
as 3:2012cv00893
Plaintiff:
Devon J. Parker
Defendant:
Joe Easterling, Deanne Mills, Dorothy Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Bell et al
as 3:2011cv01135
Plaintiff:
Chris Chapman
Defendant:
Ricky Bell, Sandra Hall, (f/n/u) Mosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daniel H Jones
Defendant:
Robert H Montgomery, Jr, Lynn Brown, Robert Kupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Wallace v. State of Tennessee Department, et al
as 10-6307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC DEWAYNE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, STEPHEN DOTSON, Warden and others
Herron v. Kelly
as 1:2010cv01783
Respondent:
Bennie Kelly
Petitioner:
Charles Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Herron v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 3:2009cv00489
Petitioner:
Jason Herron
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herron v. Wolfolk et al
as 1:2009cv01061
Plaintiff:
Montorius Herron
Defendant:
David Wolfolk, Lt. Petty and Madison County Criminal Justice Complex
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
