Cases 31 - 40 of 165
Jessie Johnpillai v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 22-3708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSIE JOHNPILLAI
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, HAROLD MAY, Warden, CHARLOTTE OWENS, Warden and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT NAPLE, CONNIE HORTON and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT NAPLE, CONNIE HORTON and others
Monaco v. John Doe (1) et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jason David Monaco
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Clark, IV v. Adams, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, T. LOVATO, Correctional Officer, RALPH SACKETT, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICA HUSS, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ERICA HUSS, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Phillip Bloodworth v. Mark Pouperd, et al
as 22-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP BLOODWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER MARK POUPERD, JOHN DOE 1, 1st Shift Commander, CORRECTION OFFICER FORD and others
Brown v. FBOP et al
as 6:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Roland Brown
Defendant:
FBOP, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
