Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Brenner v. Joseph et al
as 3:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
Carla Brenner
Defendant:
Carla Joseph, Fakisha Swader, Daron Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Hamblen County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Justin C Murphy
Defendant:
Hamblen County Jail and Rookie Inman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. C.C.A. Whiteville Facility et al
as 1:2010cv01209
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
C.C.A. Whiteville Facility, Harris, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escue v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ricky D. Escue
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Koehn, f/n/u Wardlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumpas v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Brian Koehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hays v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Paula Hays and Paula Hays
Defendant:
Henderson County, Brian Duke, Leilani Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Degans v. Murphy
as 3:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jerome Degans
Defendant:
John Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralph v. Blake et al
as 4:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D Ralph
Defendant:
Rebekah L Blake, Jackie Matheny, Tommy - Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burl v. Dotson et al
as 1:2009cv01086
Plaintiff:
Miko T. Burl
Defendant:
Stephen Dotson, Grady Perry, Tammy Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funzie v. Little et al
as 1:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Rudell Funzie
Defendant:
George Little, Wayne Brandon, Bruce Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
