Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Kelly v. Warden, London Correctional Institute We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00254
Petitioner: Otis M Kelly, Jr
Respondent: Warden, London Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Timmerman-Cooper
as 2:2011cv00293
Petitioner: Otis M Kelly, Jr
Respondent: Deb Timmerman-Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
El Bey v. Moore et al
as 2:2011cv02230
Plaintiff: :Ptah-Ra-Amun-Ankh: El Bey
Defendant: Robert Moore, H. Williams, C. Wages and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis Myles, Jr. v. Cindi Curtin
as 11-1298
Petitioner - Appellant: OTIS MYLES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: CINDI CURTIN
D.C. v. Riley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00208
Plaintiff: D.C.
Defendant: Gary Riley, Thomas Richardson and Otis Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plemons v. Rea et al
as 1:2010cv00066
Plaintiff: David H. Plemons
Defendant: Kevin Rea and Otis Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plemons v. Rea et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff: David H. Plemons
Defendant: Kevin Rea, Otis Campbell, Brenda Maxey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunter v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00057
Petitioner: Stephen Otis Gunter
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Charles Brock v. James Kerley, et al
as 09-5878
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES BROCK
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES PHILLIP KERLEY, Attorney at Law and OTIS HIGGS, Judge in Division 2 at the Criminal Court of Shelby County Tennessee
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2009cv11371
Plaintiff: Raymond Lane
Defendant: Michael King, William Hubbard, Donald Woods and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?