Cases 41 - 50 of 17,797
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Colvin v. USA
as 1:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Mashi Colvin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin, II v. Medina Township Police et al.
as 1:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Franklin, II, Vince and Vinny
Defendant:
Medina Township Police and Officer E. Chaperlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Henderson
as 4:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckstein v. Franklin County Corrections II et al.
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Eckstein
Defendant:
Franklin County Corrections II, Armor Health, Dallas Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Davis and Chaplain Alfred Marcus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. O'Donnell
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Justin Goins
Defendant:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
