Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Willie Davis v. Tony Arvin, et al
as 12-5870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY R. ARVIN, Assistant United States Attorney and MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., former Shelby County Sheriff
Willie Davis v. David Kustoff
as 12-5749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID KUSTOFF, former United States Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv12697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv12700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
T. Bryan, et al v. Security Equipment Corp., et al
as 12-5269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
T. TERELL BRYAN
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CORLEY and JONATHAN D. SIMMONS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
SECURITY EQUIPMENT CORP., DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY CORP. OF AMERICA, FBI and others
Yohannes v. United States Attorney General
as 2:2011cv14977
Petitioner:
Getachew Yohannes
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director of, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Field Office Director of, John Doe and others
Bryan et al v. Security Equipment Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan, Marcus Corley and Jonathan D. Simmons, III
Defendant:
Security Equipment Corp., Defense Technology Corp of America, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerdine v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2011cv01013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Stacy Gwin, Donna Cambiero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bolt, Sr. v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 11-1598
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE BOLT, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, SECRETARY OF INTERIOR, MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
