Cases 61 - 70 of 197
Colvin #192744 v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2012cv00934
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Colvin #192744, Jr.
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Michael L. Brostoski, Theresa M. Merling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyle Longacre v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 12-2110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE JOSEPH LONGACRE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SNYDER, Governor, State of Michigan, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, UNKNOWN CURLEY, Warden and others
Pasley #185340 v. Prison Health Services
as 1:2012cv00891
Defendant:
Prison Health Services
Plaintiff:
Everett Pasley #185340
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pasley v. Prison Health Services
as 1:2012cv13600
Plaintiff:
Everett Pasley
Defendant:
Prison Health Services
Courtemanche #204238 v. Czop et al
as 1:2012cv00841
Plaintiff:
Richard Courtemanche #204238
Defendant:
Richard Czop, Haresh Pandya, Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Rapelje et al
as 2:2012cv13379
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Lloyd Rapelje, Jeffrey C. Stieve, MD, Craig Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gresham v. Richard Czop, et al
as 12-1873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CZOP, MICHAEL KENNERLY, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC. and others
Jones v. Prison Health Services, Inc.
as 2:2012cv12872
Plaintiff:
Quincy Lamont Ephriam Jones
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall #416454 v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00555
Plaintiff:
Reggie Marshall #416454
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Robert Crompton and Cindi Curtin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon #186015 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony McClendon #186015
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Jeri-Ann Sherry, Unknown Stieve and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
