Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Charles Fields v. Michael Martin, et al
as 14-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden and GERALD RILEY
Defendant:
DAN LESATZ, et al
Nigel Whittaker v. Matthew Obiden, et al
as 14-1915
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIGEL WHITTAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW OBIDEN, Sergeant, PATRICK LAPOINTE, Correctional Officer, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as John Doe, Correctional Officer and others
Alrelio Evans v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 14-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS, (all similiarly situated prisoners) Other named Plaintiffs without signatures: D. Allison #416330, D. Settles #301268, K. Colvin Jr. #192744, C. West II #A237293,
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, KENNETH MCGINNIS, Director, MIKE MARTIN, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Deandre Riley v. John Prelesnik
as 14-1570
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEANDRE RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK
Riley v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jamie Matthew Riley
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jamie Matthew Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherron v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2014cv01043
Plaintiff:
Riley W. Sherron
Defendant:
Sherry Wilcox, Lisa and Bargery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Riley v. Sherry Burt
as 13-2219
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERRY BURT, Warden
Freeland Riley v. Clark Taylor
as 13-6175
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREELAND THOMAS RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
CLARK TAYLOR, Warden
William Walker v. Riley McIntyre, et al
as 13-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RILEY MCINTYRE, AMF Clan Member; Prison Guard, GENA HEALEY, AMF Clan Member; Ast. Resident Unit Supervisor, WILLIAM JONDREAU, AMF Clan Member and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
