Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Arthur Blank v. Michigan Department of Correc, et al
as 16-2441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR BLANK
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTHCARE OF MICHIGAN, KEITH PAPENDICK, MD, TERRANCE WHITEMAN and others
Blanks v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01539
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Blanks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blanks v. Batts et al
as 2:2016cv02177
Petitioner:
Quincey LeShun Blanks
Respondent:
Myron Batts, Carpenter and James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carethers et al v. Funches
as 2:2015cv14016
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carethers, Arthur Blank, Ricky Williams and others
Defendant:
Funches
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quincey Blanks v. USA
as 14-6270
Petitioner - Appellant:
QUINCEY LESHUN BLANKS, aka Quincey Porter, aka Kevin Wilson, aka David Lee
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blank v. Michigan Department of Corrections Bureau of Healthcare Services et al
as 2:2014cv13235
Plaintiff:
Arthur Blank
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Bureau of Healthcare Services, Corizon Healthcare of Michigan, Keith Papendick and others
Blanks v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02137
Petitioner:
Quincey LeShun Blanks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blanks v. Cherry et al
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Shon Q Blanks
Defendant:
Sgt. Bill Cherry, Jr., Bradley County Justice Center, Clay Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quincey Blanks v. John Sellars, et al
as 12-6529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINCEY LESHUN BLANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ROBERT SELLARS and PRIMARY CARE SPECIALIST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
