Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Wright v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynette Wright
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Stanley C. Dickerson, Talea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Weakley County, TN et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Weakley County, TN, Robby Hatler and FNU Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Jaccson et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Jaccson and Kent Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caddell et al v. Obion County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Caddell, Deandre" Pickering, Gary Baker and others
Defendant:
Obion County Detention Center, Carl Jackson, Kent Treece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Weakley County
as 1:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Weakley County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Alford v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 22-4082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, et al, ERNIE MOORE, JOCELYN SCHWEITZER and others
Campbell v. Crutchfield
as 1:2020cv01693
Petitioner:
Isiah Campbell and Isaiah Campbell
Respondent:
Warden Warren Crutchfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Crutchfield
as 1:2019cv02724
Petitioner:
Michael Marbuery Davis
Respondent:
George Crutchfield and Warden George Crutchfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crutchfield v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00644
Petitioner:
Sydney Crutchfield
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bloodworth v. Mohr et al
as 1:2016cv01049
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bloodworth
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Gary Croft, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
