Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Colley v. Nessel et al
as 2:2024cv10952
Petitioner:
Lawrence Lee Colley
Respondent:
Dana Nessel, Catherine Bauman, Hubble and others
Brent Nash v. A. Bryce, et al
as 24-1263
Plaintiff:
BRENT JAMES NASH
Defendant:
A. BRYCE, Correctional Officer, official and personal capacity, C. TURNER, Correctional Officer, official and personal capacity, BECKY CARL, Acting warden, official and personal capacity and others
Garrett v. Nessel et al
as 4:2023cv13094
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, John Doe, Norene Adams and others
Herman Page v. Fredeane Artis
as 23-1213
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERMAN PAGE
Respondent / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL and FREDEANE ARTIS, Warden
Williams v. Muskegon County 60th District Court et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Torrance Leon Williams
Defendant:
Muskegon County 60th District Court, Muskegon County Circuit Court, Michael J. Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anttonio Rollins v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTTONIO ROLLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor and DANA NESSEL, Attorney General
Baytops v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv10339
Plaintiff:
Milton Baytops
Defendant:
Harper, Dana Nessell, Robyn B. Frankely and others
Woods #115202 v. Hill
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Deantwuan Woods #115202
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnaby v. Michigan State Government et al
as 2:2022cv12387
Plaintiff:
Owen W. Barnaby
Defendant:
Michigan State Government, Gretchen Whitmer, Jennifer Granholm and others
Derrick Cardello-Smith v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE CARDELLO-SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EXECUTIVE POLICY TEAM/COMMITTEE, of Michigan Department of Corrections, ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM/DIVISION, of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
