Cases 1 - 10 of 432
Hester v. Chester County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Michael Hester
Defendant:
Chester County, Tennessee, Blair Weaver, Mark Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ryans v. USA
as 3:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Mark Christopher Ryans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griffin v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Griffin
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobson v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Mark Dobson
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. l/n/u et al
as 3:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith, Mark Montano, Howard Warren and others
Defendant:
Kara l/n/u, Wellpath Ceo, Kia l/n/u and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02252
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. USA
as 4:2023cv00001
Petitioner:
Mark Daniel Allen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Erby v. Shelby County Sheriff Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02849
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Jail, Floyd Bonner, Chief of Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
