Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Brian McElroy v. Zachary Ropos, et al
as 23-4037
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH MCELROY
Defendant:
ZACHARY ROPOS, Patrol Sergeant, Shield #50, FRANK J. LEONBRUNO, Sheriff, Shield #145 and CITY OF PAINESVILLE, OH
McElroy v. Ropos et al
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith McElroy
Defendant:
Patrol SGT Zachary Ropos, #145 Sheriff Frank LeonBruno and City of Painesville, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin McElroy v. Kim Henderson
as 23-3395
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN MCELROY
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Brian McElroy v. City of Painesville, OH
as 23-3174
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH MCELROY
Respondent / Appellee:
CITY OF PAINESVILLE, OH
McElroy v. Leonbruno
as 1:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Brian Keith McElroy
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank Leonbruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Leonbruno, et al.
as 1:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Brian Keith McElroy
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank Leonbruno, City of Painesville and Lake County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McElroy v. Malchesky et al
as 1:2022cv02098
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith McElroy
Defendant:
Paul Malchesky, SGT Zachary Ropos, Charles Coulson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. City of Painesville
as 1:2022cv02101
Petitioner:
Brian Keith McElroy
Respondent:
City of Painesville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
