Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Reid v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Wesley Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Harmon et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Stephen Harmon, Comprehensive Correctional Care and Nora Janes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care and Stephen Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Blessing
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Linda Blessing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Med Center Health/EMS
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Med Center Health/EMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Scott County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Defendant:
Latosha Jordan Tucker, Scott County Detention Center, Jailer Derran Broyles and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Suffolk County Probation Department, MA
as 6:2021cv00140
Petitioner:
Gordon C. Reid
Respondent:
Suffolk County Probation Department, MA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reid v. Gomez
as 6:2021cv00137
Petitioner:
Gordon C. Reid
Respondent:
Warden Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
vanHouten et al v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
James Fulz, Russell Clemons, Anthony Harvey and others
Defendant:
Core Civic, Janet Conover, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Hopkins County Fiscal Court et al
as 4:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Morris T. Cunningham, Hopkins County Fiscal Court and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Medina Ray Reid, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
