Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Defendant:
Sgt. Haskins, Deputy Turner, Sgt. Dorgan and others
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Eric Berry, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Tyler, James A. Daley, Sgt. Dorgan and others
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddie v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
LaRico Dwayne Gaddie, Sr.
Defendant:
David Knight, Steven Carter, Darryl Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
Jailer James A. Daley, Lt. Hoyer, Maj. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shields v. McKenzie
as 1:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Shields, Sr.
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sneed v. Louisville Metro Police Department
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Sneed, Sr.
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Kenney et al
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronny Deviod Walker, Sr., Ron D.M, D.J. Ron G. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kenney, Angela Turner Dunham, k.buscaglia@copyright.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
