Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Sauve #644660 v. Simmons
as 1:2024cv00919
Defendant:
Unknown Simmons
Plaintiff:
Tyler Scott Sauve #644660
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jurewicz v. Rewerts
as 2:2024cv12288
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Jurewicz
Defendant:
Warden Randy Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott #945240 v. Welty et al
as 1:2024cv00860
Defendant:
Unknown Welty and Unknown Brown
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Scott #945240
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs #398621 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Holt, Brenda James and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin Stubbs #398621
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Walburn et al
as 5:2024cv11721
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Steward Robinson
Defendant:
Melissa Dykman, Robert M. Hayes, Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Albers #15580-040 v. United States
as 1:2024cv00649
Petitioner:
David Scott Albers #15580-040
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ouellete #766867 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellete #766867
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott #895268 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Darcy Montel Scott #895268
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts and Unknown Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv11212
Plaintiff:
Darcy Montel Scott
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts and Ward
Sutton v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Sutton, III
Defendant:
Scott Wriggelsworth, Unknown Party and Glen Cipullo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
