Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Morris Weatherspoon v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 16-1277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, UNKNOWN BRONTOWSKI, UNKNOWN BRAND, Physician Assistant and others
Weatherspoon #471817 v. Woods et al
as 2:2014cv00142
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Unknown Brontowski, Unknown Brand and others
Plaintiff:
Morris Weatherspoon #471817
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley #631420 v. Shubert, et al
as 2:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Randy Beasley #631420
Defendant:
Unknown Shubert, Samantha Belonga, Unknown Dicus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Opelton Kelly v. R. Shubert, et al
as 10-1963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OPELTON KELLY
Defendant:
R. SHUBERT, Correctional Officer, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Unknown Warden, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Unknown Deputy Warden, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Unknown Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Kelly #225090 v. Shubert et al
as 2:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Opelton Kelly #225090
Defendant:
R. Shubert, Unknown Party, Patricia L. Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aubrey Stanley v. Michael Smith, et al
as 08-2375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUBREY STANLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL SMITH, Corrections Officer, in his individual and official capacity, also named as "Micheal Smith", ROY HEADLEY, Corrections Officer, in his individual and official capacity, R. SHUBERT, Corrections Officer, in their individual and official capacity and others
Huffman #429958 v. Shubert
as 2:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
Dustin Huffman #429958
Defendant:
R. Shubert
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stanley #257143 v. Smith et al
as 2:2007cv00139
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Stanley #257143
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Roy Headley, R. Shubert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
