Cases 1 - 10 of 19
James Damron, et al v. Len Dodrill, et al
as 22-3183
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. DAMRON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SCOTT HEID
Defendant / Appellee:
LEN DODRILL, Unit Manager, In his individual and official capacity, ERIC GRAVES, Lieutenant Coordinator, In his individual and official capacity, MELODY HASKINS, A.A., In her individual and official capacity and others
Damron et al v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
James E Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Defendant:
Len Dodrill, Eric Graves, Melody Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Berenson et al
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Dodson
Defendant:
David Berenson and J Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Berenson et al
as 2:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Dodson
Defendant:
David Berenson and J Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 17-3007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, ROB L. JEFFREYS, Warden, L C COVAL and others
Durham v. Mohr et al
as 2:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Durham, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Rob Jeffreys, L C Coval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Jones v. Gary Croft, et al
as 14-3304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY R. CROFT, Chief Inspector and WHITTEN, Inspector
Norman Whiteside v. Terry Collins, et al
as 13-3613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN V. WHITESIDE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY COLLINS, MICHAEL SHEETS, Warden, TREVOR CLARK and others
Brown v. Mohr et al
as 2:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Steven S. Brown
Defendant:
Director Mohr, Austin Stout, Greg Trout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mohr et al
as 1:2012cv00583
Plaintiff:
Steven S. Brown
Defendant:
Director Mohr, Mary Anne Reese, Austin Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
