Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Clendenning v. NewPage Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00492
Defendant:
NewPage Corporation, NewPage Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan, Does 1 through 20 and others
Plaintiff:
William Clendenning
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stratton et al v. GKN North America Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
John Stratton, John Stratton, John Stratton and others
Defendant:
GKN North America Services, Inc., GKN Program of Hospital-Medical Benefits for Eligible Pensioners and Surving Spouses, GKN Program of Insurance Benefits and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore et al v. Menasha Corporation
as 1:2008cv01167
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore, Eleanor Rhodes, Gustave Peppel and others
Defendant:
Menasha Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pronesti et al v. Acument Global Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv15086
Plaintiff:
Vincent Pronesti, Dominick Caruso and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Acument Global Technologies, Incorporated, Acument Retiree Life Insurance Plan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Astro Shapes, Inc.
as 4:2008cv02851
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC and others
Defendant:
Astro Shapes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Equitable Resources, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper and Forest, et al
as 08-6444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC and LOCAL 8-512
Equitable Resources, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC et al
as 7:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
Equitable Resources, Inc. and Equitable Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and Local 8-512
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hobert Tackett, et al v. M&G Polymers USA, LLC
as 07-4515
Plaintiff:
HOBERT FREEL TACKETT
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant - Appellee:
M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC
Redington, et al. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
as 5:2007cv01999
Plaintiff:
Gerald C. Redington, Gerald C. Redington, Gerald C. Redington and others
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC et al v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation
as 1:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 323 United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers and others
Defendant:
Dixie Consumer Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
