Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wesseler v. Louis DeJoy
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Mark Wesseler and Mark B Wesseler
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Durden v. Postmaster General of the United States et al
as 3:2021cv01890
Plaintiff:
Denea Durden
Defendant:
Postmaster General of the United States and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Jackson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2021cv10966
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL LOUIS DEJOY and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cincinnati v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv05231
Plaintiff:
Robert Cincinnati
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kedric Mitchell v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 17-2349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEDRIC MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Julian Hood, Jr. v. Patrick Donahoe
as 15-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, named as Patrick R. Donahue, Postmaster General
Booker v. United States Postal Office, Postmaster General et al
as 4:2015cv10631
Plaintiff:
Mae A Booker
Defendant:
United States Postal Office, Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
Mitchell v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2014cv13916
Plaintiff:
Kedric Mitchell
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Postmaster General for the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
