Cases 101 - 110 of 174
Laning v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Marcia Laning
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. United States et al
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Lane
Defendant:
United States, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lorie J. Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lane v. Bova
as 1:2015cv00071
Petitioner:
William Lane
Respondent:
Frank Bova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv02803
Plaintiff:
Maria Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Eagle Express Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv02677
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Lane
Defendant:
Eagle Express Lines, Inc. , Richard Gromley, Operator 6 Executive Security, LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
Operator 6 Executive Security, LLC, SDP, LLC and SP Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fenner Dunlop Americas, Inc. v. Veyance Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2014mc00085
Movant:
Fenner Dunlop Americas, Inc.
Respondent:
Veyance Technologies, Inc. and Russell Edward Lane
Hurley v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20545
Plaintiff:
Lane C. Hurley
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westmoreland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02132
Plaintiff:
Gary Lane Westmoreland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geary et al v. Liberty Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Gene Geary , Ricky Lane , Susan Lane and others
Defendant:
Liberty Industries, Inc. and Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
