Cases 151 - 160 of 601
Cox v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pifer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Amy Pifer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schlenker et al v. City of Wapakoneta
as 3:2020cv02733
Defendant:
City of Wapakoneta
Plaintiff:
David Schlenker and Amy Schlenker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knowles v. Core Civic Association et al
as 2:2020cv06277
Defendant:
Vince Vantell, Milhoun, Warden LeRose and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shine-Johnson et al v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2020cv05919
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Joseph Murphy, UMC Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
James Goodson, Richardo Taborn, Bobby Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivanoff v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00896
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., CL Products International, LLC, Luminex Home Decor and Fragrance Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Ivanoff, Brandon Bulger, Scott T. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle v. Riverside Recovery Service, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv05881
Defendant:
AMY SMART, TODD WELLS, AMY WILFONG and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shine-Johnson et al v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2023cv03233
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Richard Whitman
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amy King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
