Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Priorities USA, et al v. Dana Nessel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1931
Plaintiff / Appellee: RISE, INC., PRIORITIES USA and DETROIT/DOWNRIVER CHAPTER OF THE A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
Defendant: DANA NESSEL
Intervenor: MICHIGAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY and others
Amicus Curiae: JOSHUA A. DOUGLAS, NICHOLAS STEPHANOPOULOS, JUSTIN LEVITT and others
A. Philip Randolph Inst. of OH, et al v. Frank LaRose
as 20-4068
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOLI COLLINS, C. ELLEN CONNALLY, SARAH RIKLEEN and others
Defendant: FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio
Intervenor: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Memphis A.Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6046
Defendant / Appellee: MARK GOINS, AMY P. WEIRICH and TRE HARGETT
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE EQUITY ALLIANCE, SEKOU FRANKLIN, MEMPHIS A. PHILLIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff: KENDRA LEE
League of Women Voters of Ohio et al v. LaRose
as 2:2020cv03843
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of Ohio, Carolyn E. Campbell, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Defendant: Frank LaRose
Intervenor Defendant: Ohio Republican Party, National Republican Congressional Committee, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of Ohio et al v. LaRose
as 2:2020cv01638
Plaintiff: Audrianna Victorian Rodriguez, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Hannah Tuvall and others
Defendant: Frank LaRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute et al v. Kasich et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00357
Plaintiff: Linda Goldenhar, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Elizabeth Myer and others
Defendant: Governor John R. Kasich, Secretary of State Jon A. Husted, Larry Obhof and others
In Re: Warden John Morgan and Edward Gillespie
Intervenor: Robert F Bodi, Franklin County Republican Party, Rep. Dave Joyce and others
Amicus Curiae: Lake and Geauga County Boards of Commissioners
Petitioner: Adam Kincaid, Republican National Committee, Thomas Whatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Priorities USA et al v. Nessel
as 4:2020cv10211
Plaintiff: Rise, Inc., Priorities USA and Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute
Defendant: Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. Larry Obhof, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3551
Petitioner / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, KATHRYN DEITSCH and others
Defendant: FRANK LAROSE, Secretary of the State of Ohio, LARRY HOUSEHOLDER, Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives and LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 18-4258
Petitioner / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Defendant / Appellee: GOVERNOR JOHN R. KASICH, In his official capacity, LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate, in his official capacity, JON HUSTED, Secretary of State of Ohio, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE OF OHIO and others
Intervenor: STEVE CHABOT, et al
SUBPOENA SERVED ON E. MARK BRADEN
as 1:2018mc00029
Respondent: Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Cynthia Libster, League of Women Voters of Ohio and others
In Re: SUBPOENA SERVED ON E. MARK BRADEN
Petitioner: E. Mark Braden and Ohio Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?