Cases 11 - 20 of 388
Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv03368
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Sondra L. Bowers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Encarnacion-Lafontaine v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02652
Petitioner:
Edgar Encarnacion-Lafontaine
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oziel Cantu v. F. Bowers
as 23-5853
Petitioner / Appellant:
OZIEL CANTU
Respondent / Appellee:
F. J. BOWERS, Warden
Bowers et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02858
Plaintiff:
Laura Bowers and Wesley Bowers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clinton v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02548
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bowers v. USA
as 5:2023cv01643
Petitioner:
Nicholas B. Bowers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jeffrey Price v. USA, et al
as 23-1743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY L. PRICE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Kellie Farris v. Oakland County, MI, et al
as 23-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLIE FARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
OAKLAND COUNTY, MI, DEPUTY MARK BOWERING, DEPUTY ERIN VINCENT and others
Mays v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Petitioner:
James Mays, III
Defendant:
Collette Peters
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
