Cases 11 - 20 of 28
E. W. et al v.CVS Caremark Corporation
as 2:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
E. W. and Shauna Wilson
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Kortyna v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02510
Plaintiff:
Albert Kortyna and Pauline Kortyna
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Karen Marcey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Leach v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv13100
Plaintiff:
Dorrie Leach
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Michigan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Renfro v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00414
Plaintiff:
James Renfro
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Ohio CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
John Zidian Company v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 4:2010cv02347
Plaintiff:
John Zidian Company, Inc.
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parent v. Perrigo Florida, Inc.
as 1:2010sp80059
Plaintiff:
Bruce D. Parent
Defendant:
Perrigo Florida, Inc, CVS Caremark Corporation, C.B. Fleet Holding Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SFD Enterprise, LLC vs. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al.
as 2:2010cv10769
Plaintiff:
SFD Enterprise, LLC
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Symtek, Inc.
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Advanced Healthcare Distributors, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv14359
Plaintiff:
Innovation Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Advanced Healthcare Distributors, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
