Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Doyle v. Cox et al
as 2:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc., Gavin Cox, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forster et al v. Carter Distributing Company, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jacob Forster , Gavin Warrick and Charles Hammon
Defendant:
Carter Distributing Company, Inc., Premium Brands, Inc. and Blair Carter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Lake v. Midland Funding, LLC et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
Gavin Lake
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Glassburn v. Weakley County et al
as 1:2012cv01107
Plaintiff:
Lester Glassburn
Defendant:
Weakley County , Mike Wilson , David Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maynard v. Hale et al
as 3:2011cv01233
Plaintiff:
Duston Dean Maynard
Defendant:
Pam Hale, Bruce Helms, Jessie Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gavin v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2009cv02585
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Gavin
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavin v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2009cv02543
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Gavin
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bostic v. City of Nashville et al
as 3:2007cv00357
Plaintiff:
James E. Bostic
Defendant:
City of Nashville, Metro Davidson County, Tennessee, Metro Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostic v. City of Nashville et al
as 3:2007mc00025
Plaintiff:
James E. Bostic
Defendant:
City of Nashville, Metro Davidson County, Tennessee, Metro Sheriff's Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
