Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Smith v. Sampson et al
as 2:2008cv14002
Plaintiff:
Brady Smith
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, Miguel Berrios, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Sipes #271473 et al v. Sampson et al
as 2:2008cv00213
Plaintiff:
Bennett Wayne Sipes #271473, Ronald George Grandchamp #496925, Dale Douglas Denton #322917 and others
Defendant:
Barbara S. Sampson, Laurin Thomas, James Quinlan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller #190809 v. Quinlan et al
as 1:2008cv00659
Plaintiff:
Sonny R. Miller #190809
Defendant:
James Quinlan, Enid Livingston, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Earl #256098 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Allen Earl #256098
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Barbara Sampson, Miguel Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wicks #228039 v. Rubitschun et al
as 1:2008cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jerald Oscar Wicks #228039
Defendant:
John Rubitschun, James Quinlan, Charles E. Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wicks #228039 v. Rubitschun et al
as 2:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jerald Oscar Wicks #228039
Defendant:
John Rubitschun, James Quinlan, Charles E. Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford #304525 v. Quinlan
as 1:2008cv00256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ford #304525
Defendant:
James Quinlan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford v. Quinlan
as 5:2008cv11041
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ford
Defendant:
James Quinlan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wicks v. Rubitschin et al
as 4:2008cv10976
Plaintiff:
Jerald Wicks
Defendant:
John Rubitschin, James Quinlan, Charles Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Prater #259314 v. Rubitschun et al
as 2:2008cv00039
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Prater #259314
Respondent:
John Rubitschun, Barbara S. Sampson, James Quinlan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
