Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Newsome v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04201
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN NEWSOME
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jankovic v. O'Conner et al
as 5:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
Nenad Jankovic
Defendant:
Chief Justice Maureen O'Conner, Diane Hayes and Ann Yackshow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaBurt v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
Maureen LaBurt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Maureen Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schwegel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
Maureen Schwegel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilding v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Maureen Wilding
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Doe v. Bowling Green State University
as 3:2022cv00140
Defendant:
Bowling Green State University, Christopher Bullins, Jeremy Zilmer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
