Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Rowan County Fiscal Court v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45018
Plaintiff:
Rowan County Fiscal Court
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Rowan County Fiscal Court v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 0:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Rowan County Fiscal Court
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bluegrass Dutch Trust Morehead v. Rowan County Fiscal Court, et al
as 17-6086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLUEGRASS DUTCH TRUST MOREHEAD, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ROWAN COUNTY FISCAL COURT, RAY WHITE, DARRELL GLOVER and others
Chris Sevier v. Kim Davis, et al
as 17-5654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS SEVIER, 310 Duke Road, Lexington KY 40502
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM DAVIS, in her official capacity as Clerk of Rowan County, MATT BEVIN, in his official capacity as Governor of Kentucky and ANDREW G. BESHEAR, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Clerk of Attorney General for Kentucky
David Ermold, et al v. Kim Davi
as 16-6412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ERMOLD and DAVID MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM DAVIS, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Rowan County Clerk
Bluegrass Dutch Trust Morehead, LLC v. Rowan County Fiscal Court et al
as 0:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
Bluegrass Dutch Trust Morehead, LLC
Defendant:
Rowan County Fiscal Court , Ray White , Darrell Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates et al v. Davis et al
as 0:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
James Yates and Will Smith
Defendant:
Kim Davis and Rowan County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. Davis et al
as 0:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
April Miller , Karen Ann Roberts , Shantel Burke and others
Defendant:
Kim Davis and Rowan County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
