Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Layne et al v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christie Layne and Harvey Lane
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
United States of America v. AK Steel Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00996
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
AK Steel Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Akzo Nobel Paints LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lawler et al v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
as 2:2008cv02363
Plaintiff:
William Lawler and Jacquelyn Lawler
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company v. Dow Chemical Company et al
as 5:2008cv01118
Plaintiff:
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and others
Defendant:
Dow Deustschland GmbH & Co., OHG, Dow Europe GmbH, Eni S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
as 3:2008mc00007
Plaintiff:
Hye Lee
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Lee v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
as 3:2008mc00008
Plaintiff:
Hye Lee
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-6089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
