Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Thomas v. Jefferson County Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson County Corrections, Tom Campbell, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Neal v. McFerley et al
as 3:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
Antonio Devon O'Neal
Defendant:
McFerley and Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. Campbell et al
as 3:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
Curtis Renee Ellis
Defendant:
Tom Campbell, Jefferson County Department of Corrections and Medical Staff of Jefferson County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2008cv00521
Plaintiff:
Victor Martin
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Jerry Abramson, Louisville Metro Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maynard v. Campbell
as 3:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Timothy DeWayne Maynard
Defendant:
Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grady v. Campbell et al
as 3:2008cv00385
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Grady
Defendant:
Tom Campbell and Patricia Kneeling
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Graham et al
as 3:2008cv00357
Plaintiff:
Mike Le'Dante Marshall, Sr.
Defendant:
Graham, Jefferson Co. Correction Officers and Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thomas v. Campbell
as 3:2008cv00368
Petitioner:
Myron Otis Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ja-Ron Teague, et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 08-5693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOES, All Inmates under Jurisdiction of (LMDC) Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, CHAD MCQUILLING, DARRYL BUNZY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, JERRY ABRAMSON, Mayor of Louisville and others
Teague v. Campbell et al
as 3:2008cv00260
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron Shawn Teague
Defendant:
Tom Campbell and Louisville Metro Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
