Cases 191 - 200 of 2,980
Bonham v. Laurain et al
as 2:2023cv11594
Plaintiff:
Kevin Emanuel Bonham
Defendant:
Laurain, Michigan Department of Corrections and Corizon Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Killian v. King et al
as 2:2023cv11577
Plaintiff:
Travor Austin Killian and Trevor Austin Killian
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Sheriff's Department, Port Huron Police Department and others
Spoors v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv11531
Plaintiff:
LaTanya V. Spoors
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E Washington, Grand Praire Healthcare Services and others
Loomis v. Bay County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv11511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Loomis
Defendant:
Bay County Sheriff's Department and Department of Corrections, State of Michigan
Estes v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv11492
Plaintiff:
Larry Wendell Estes, Larry Kush and Little Larry
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Peterson v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv11493
Plaintiff:
Toran Peterson
Defendant:
Madeline Young, Ronald W. Chapman, Jeffrey L. Bomber and others
Jenkins v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv02384
Petitioner:
Eric Tyrone Jenkins
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. Chapman
as 5:2023cv11474
Petitioner:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Willis Chapman
Estes v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv11470
Plaintiff:
Larry Wendell Estes
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Alrelio Evans v. J. Atearn, et al
as 23-1553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS, named as Alrelio L. Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT CHIEF J. ATEARN, in his individual capacity, WARDEN MATT MACAULEY, in his individual capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN R. BROWKAW, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
