Cases 21 - 30 of 511
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Carter v. Jerry Wardlow
as 24-5216
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DAMON CARTER
Respondent:
JERRY WARDLOW, Warden
Lanier v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damon JohnsonIn re: Damon Johnson
as 24-1158
Petitioner:
In re: DAMON LAMAR JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robbins et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Damone Robbins and Christina Robbins
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC and Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Timothy Carter v. Jerry Wardlow
as 24-5148
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DAMON CARTER
Respondent:
JERRY WARDLOW, Warden
Yang et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Damon Yang and Betty Yang
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cook et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Christa Cook and Christopher Derick Montgomery
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown-Perry et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rekiesha Brown-Perry and Justin Brown
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
