Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jose Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East, Incorporat
as 10-1173
Debtor:
In re: JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Stuart Gold, Trustee For, The estate of
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, INCORPORATED
Jose Rodriguez, Jr. v. Jeffrey Woods
as 10-1131
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Respondent:
JAN E. TROMBLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
MILLICENT WARREN and JEFFREY WOODS
Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv14926
Plaintiff:
Jose A Rodriguez
Defendant:
Fedex Freight East, Inc., Fedex Freight East, Inc., Rodney Adkinson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv14702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Type:
Other Statutes
Rodriguez-Reyes v Ford Motor Company
as 2:2009cv12348
Plaintiff:
Jose A Rodriguez-Reyes, Jose A Rodriguez-Reyes, Juan Rodriguez-Acevedo and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Real Property
USA v. Jose Rodriguez
as 08-4507
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ, aka Lou, aka Mexican Lou
Jose Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East, Incorporat
as 08-2272
Debtor:
In re: JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Stuart Gold, Trustee For, The estate of
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, DETROIT CHAPTER
Rodriguez v. Easterling
as 3:2008cv00175
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Rodriguez
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
